<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Gov&#8217;t Subpoenas Google Search Records</title>
	<link>http://www.chadsnews.com/2006/01/20/us-govt-subpoenas-google-search-records/</link>
	<description>News items and other various tidbits that Chad Cloman finds interesting enough to share with his friends.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Chad Cloman</title>
		<link>http://www.chadsnews.com/2006/01/20/us-govt-subpoenas-google-search-records/#comment-12</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadsnews.com/2006/01/20/us-govt-subpoenas-google-search-records/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>In related news, Google shares &lt;a HREF="http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/01/20/google_shares_plummet_after_subpoena/" rel="nofollow"&gt;fell by 8.5%&lt;/A&gt; after news of its decision came to light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In related news, Google shares <a HREF="http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/01/20/google_shares_plummet_after_subpoena/" rel="nofollow">fell by 8.5%</a> after news of its decision came to light.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chad Cloman</title>
		<link>http://www.chadsnews.com/2006/01/20/us-govt-subpoenas-google-search-records/#comment-11</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadsnews.com/2006/01/20/us-govt-subpoenas-google-search-records/#comment-11</guid>
					<description>For those interested, here is some &lt;a HREF="http://news.com.com/FAQ+What+does+the+Google+subpoena+mean/2100-1029_3-6029042.html?part=rss&#38;tag=6029042&#38;subj=news" rel="nofollow"&gt;additional detail&lt;/A&gt; in a FAQ format. And it turns out that several search engines were subpoenaed, but Google was the only one that refused to comply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested, here is some <a HREF="http://news.com.com/FAQ+What+does+the+Google+subpoena+mean/2100-1029_3-6029042.html?part=rss&amp;tag=6029042&amp;subj=news" rel="nofollow">additional detail</a> in a FAQ format. And it turns out that several search engines were subpoenaed, but Google was the only one that refused to comply.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
